What did the Feedback Survey say?
We’ve had some great feedback on the new DLT model, and it’s been really helpful in shaping its future development. Here are the key themes that came up in the responses:
Clarity of the model
Strengths: Most respondents found the model clear and easy to understand. They liked the visual analogy (especially the courthouse metaphor) and the structured layout.
Challenges: Some people found the model a bit too academic. Suggestions for improvement included adding more real-life examples and creating a glossary to make things clearer.
“Excellent overview, headings, and subheadings made it easy to understand, but might be complex for newcomers.”
Relevance to participants’ experience
Mixed responses: Some people felt the model wasn’t directly relevant to their work but thought it could be useful in wider contexts. Those working in sign language policy, education, or legal reform found it more relevant.
Themes: There was a clear need for more localisation using examples from different regions.
“Probably [sign language] for people who cannot read/understand English – more inclusive representation would help.”
Applicability in practice
Cautious optimism: Respondents saw the model as having broad potential, mentioning its application in legal systems across different countries. But there were concerns about practical barriers, such as resources, training, and adapting the model to local legal systems.
Feedback highlights: There were calls for the model to be integrated into training, community work, or policy evaluation.
“This model would be effective as a potential training tool, but needs adjustment for real-life legal complexity.”
Limitations or areas for improvement
Common concerns: Accessibility was a key issue, especially for deafblind and deaf+ individuals. Some felt the model was too complex or lacked actionable steps. Others noted that it seemed too focused on legal professionals.
Themes: People wanted more focus on real-life experiences rather than abstract legal concepts.
“Seems to focus too much on gaining legal knowledge rather than empowering local communities.”
Perceived value and impact
Strong support: Many respondents felt the model was inspiring, important, and a necessary addition to legal systems. They saw it as a framework for growth and change.
Aspirational but realistic: While the vision was praised, there was concern that real-world implementation might be difficult without structural support.
“It’s inspiring, but perhaps too fantastical unless there’s a clear way to embed it in current legal systems.”
Final thoughts
The feedback shows that the DLT model resonates with people across various fields, but there are clear calls for improvement. To make it more effective, we need to simplify some parts, localise examples, and provide practical steps for real-world application. It’s clear that the vision is strong, but we need to make sure it’s accessible and grounded in real-world needs.